Continue your mission
Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) is the practice of using technology platforms to automate repetitive security tasks, orchestrate workflows across multiple security tools, and accelerate incident response through predefined playbooks.
# Security Automation and Orchestration
Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) is the practice of using technology platforms to automate repetitive security tasks, orchestrate workflows across multiple security tools, and accelerate incident response through predefined playbooks. SOAR converts the manual, repetitive work that consumes SOC analyst time (alert enrichment, IOC lookups, ticket creation, containment actions) into automated workflows that execute in seconds rather than minutes or hours.
The need is driven by scale. A mid-market SOC processes hundreds to thousands of alerts per day. Each alert requires the analyst to: read the alert, query additional data sources for context, check threat intelligence for known indicators, determine whether the alert is a true positive, and execute the appropriate response action. Manually performing these steps for every alert is operationally unsustainable. Analysts drown in repetitive tasks, high-value investigation time shrinks, and response times stretch because the analyst is still enriching alert 47 when alert 48 requires immediate containment.
SOAR platforms (Palo Alto XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel automation, Tines, Swimlane, Torq) automate the repetitive steps and orchestrate the multi-tool workflows, freeing analysts to focus on investigation, threat hunting, and detection engineering, the high-value activities that require human judgment.
Orchestration. Connecting multiple security tools into coordinated workflows. A single security event may require actions across five or more tools: the SIEM generates the alert, the EDR provides endpoint context, the threat intelligence platform checks the indicators, the firewall blocks the malicious IP, and the ticketing system creates the incident ticket. Without orchestration, the analyst manually logs into each tool, performs each action, and documents each result. With orchestration, a single workflow executes all five actions through API integrations, completing in seconds what manual execution takes 15 to 30 minutes.
Orchestration requires API integrations between the SOAR platform and every security tool in the stack. The quality and breadth of these integrations determine the SOAR platform's effectiveness: a platform with 500 pre-built integrations (covering major SIEM, EDR, firewall, identity, threat intelligence, and ticketing platforms) enables comprehensive orchestration. A platform with limited integrations forces custom development for each workflow.
Automation. Executing predefined actions without human intervention. Automation operates on a spectrum from fully automated (the system executes the entire workflow without human involvement) to semi-automated (the system executes enrichment and preparation steps, then presents the results to an analyst for a decision before executing response actions).
Fully automated playbooks are appropriate for high-confidence, low-risk actions: enriching an alert with threat intelligence lookups, creating a ticket, quarantining a known-malicious email, or blocking an IP address that appears on a confirmed threat intelligence blocklist. These actions have low false positive risk and high time savings.
Semi-automated playbooks are appropriate for high-impact actions where human judgment is needed: isolating an endpoint from the network (which disrupts the user's work), disabling a user account (which may affect business operations), or escalating to incident response (which activates organizational resources). The automation performs the enrichment and preparation. The analyst reviews and authorizes the response action.
The automation spectrum should be calibrated to the organization's risk tolerance. An organization with a mature SOC and well-tested playbooks can automate more actions fully. An organization with a new SOC and untested playbooks should keep human review in the loop for response actions until confidence builds.
Response. Executing containment, remediation, and recovery actions through the SOAR platform. Response actions include: isolating a compromised endpoint (EDR API), disabling a compromised user account (identity platform API), blocking a malicious IP or domain (firewall API), quarantining a malicious email across all mailboxes (email gateway API), and creating and updating incident tickets (ticketing system API).
Response orchestration ensures consistent execution: the playbook follows the same steps every time, documents every action, and does not skip steps that a fatigued analyst might forget at 3 AM. Consistency is a security property: a response that is executed correctly 100% of the time is more effective than a response that is executed correctly 90% of the time with occasional human error.
Playbooks are the core operational artifact in SOAR. A playbook defines the automated workflow for a specific alert type or incident scenario:
Alert enrichment playbook. Triggered by every SIEM alert. Queries the EDR for endpoint context (device name, logged-in user, recent process activity). Queries the threat intelligence platform for indicator reputation (is this IP, domain, or hash known-malicious?). Queries the identity platform for user context (user role, department, recent authentication events). Queries the CMDB for asset context (is this a production server or a development workstation?). Attaches all enrichment data to the alert ticket. Assigns a priority based on the combined context.
This playbook runs for every alert and eliminates 10 to 15 minutes of manual enrichment per alert. For a SOC processing 500 alerts per day, the enrichment playbook saves 80 to 125 analyst-hours per day. The analyst receives the alert with full context already attached and can proceed directly to investigation.
Phishing response playbook. Triggered by a user-reported phishing email or an email gateway detection. Extracts indicators from the email (sender address, URLs, attachment hashes, sending IP). Checks indicators against threat intelligence. If confirmed malicious: searches all mailboxes for the same email (by sender, subject, or attachment hash), quarantines all instances, blocks the sender domain at the email gateway, blocks any URLs at the DNS filtering layer, creates an incident ticket, and notifies the reporting user that their report has been processed. Total execution time: 2 to 5 minutes automated versus 30 to 60 minutes manual.
Compromised account playbook. Triggered by an identity protection alert (impossible travel, credential stuffed account, MFA fatigue attack). Disables the user account. Revokes all active sessions. Resets the password. Blocks the source IP at the firewall. Creates an incident ticket. Notifies the user's manager. Notifies the SOC for investigation. Execution: under 1 minute automated versus 10 to 20 minutes manual (assuming the analyst has access to all the necessary tools and knows the correct sequence).
Malware detection playbook. Triggered by EDR malware detection. Isolates the endpoint from the network. Captures a memory dump for forensic analysis. Queries the threat intelligence platform for malware family identification. Searches the SIEM for the same indicators on other endpoints (lateral movement check). Creates an incident ticket with the endpoint's process tree, network connections, and malware analysis results. Execution: 1 to 3 minutes automated.
Mean time to respond (MTTR). SOAR reduces MTTR by automating enrichment and executing response actions in seconds. A phishing response that takes 45 minutes manually takes 3 minutes with SOAR. A compromised account response that takes 15 minutes manually takes 30 seconds with SOAR.
Analyst efficiency. SOAR shifts analyst time from low-value tasks (enrichment, data gathering, ticket creation) to high-value tasks (investigation, hunting, detection engineering). The target: over 60% of analyst time on high-value activities. Without SOAR, the ratio is often inverted (60%+ on repetitive tasks).
Alert processing capacity. SOAR enables the SOC to process more alerts without adding headcount. A SOC that manually processes 200 alerts per analyst per day can process 500+ per analyst per day with automated enrichment. The capacity increase is particularly important for organizations that cannot hire additional analysts due to the cybersecurity workforce shortage.
Response consistency. SOAR ensures every response follows the defined playbook. No steps are skipped. No actions are forgotten. Every response is documented. Consistency eliminates the variance that human execution introduces, particularly during high-stress incidents or during overnight shifts when analyst attention may wane.
SOC alert volumes are increasing as organizations expand their detection coverage (more log sources, more detection rules, more EDR telemetry). Without automation, every increase in detection capability produces a proportional increase in analyst workload. The SOC reaches capacity, and additional alerts are processed slowly or not at all. SOAR breaks this constraint by automating the repetitive components of alert processing, enabling detection coverage to expand without proportional headcount increases.
The cybersecurity workforce gap (3.5 million unfilled positions globally) means organizations cannot hire their way out of alert volume problems. SOAR provides a force multiplier: existing analysts accomplish more through automation. A 5-person SOC with SOAR can provide coverage equivalent to an 8 to 10 person SOC without SOAR, depending on the automation maturity and playbook coverage.
The time between detection and containment determines the damage an attacker can cause during an incident. Every minute of containment delay is a minute the attacker uses to expand access, exfiltrate data, or deploy ransomware. SOAR reduces containment time from minutes (manual) to seconds (automated) for scenarios covered by playbooks. For ransomware specifically, the difference between 30-second automated endpoint isolation and 15-minute manual isolation can be the difference between one encrypted system and 50.
Security automation sits in the TID (Threat Intelligence and Defense) domain of the Planetary Defense Model. TID is the atmosphere: the detection and response layer. SOAR is the automated response mechanism that ensures the atmosphere's sensors (SIEM, EDR) trigger immediate defensive action when threats are detected.
CDA's Predictive Defense Intelligence (PDI) methodology incorporates automation as a response accelerator. "See the threat before it sees you." Seeing the threat (detection) is half the value. Responding before the threat achieves its objective is the other half. SOAR ensures that the response is as fast as the detection.
TID-B01 (SIEM Deployment and Tuning, 40 estimated hours) includes SOAR configuration as a component: deploying the automation platform, building core playbooks (alert enrichment, phishing response, compromised account, malware detection), integrating with the security tool stack through APIs, and testing each playbook under realistic conditions.
CDA approaches SOAR with one principle: automate the repetitive, keep humans on the judgment. Fully automated response actions should be limited to high-confidence, low-impact actions (enrichment, ticket creation, known-bad blocking). High-impact response actions (endpoint isolation, account disablement, network-wide containment) should present the enriched context to a human analyst for authorization until the playbook has been tested enough to earn full automation trust. Automation without judgment is dangerous. Judgment without automation is slow. The combination is effective.
Word count: 1,943
CDA Theater missions that address topics covered in this article.
Written by Evan Morgan
Found an issue? Help improve this article.