# Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) is an enterprise-grade endpoint detection and response platform built by Microsoft to give security teams persistent visibility into endpoint behavior, threat activity, and vulnerability exposure across device fleets of any size. It exists because traditional antivirus tools were designed to block known malware signatures, a model that fails against fileless attacks, living-off-the-land techniques, and sophisticated actors who operate entirely within trusted system processes. MDE was purpose-built to close that gap by combining kernel-level behavioral telemetry, cloud-scale analytics, automated investigation, and direct integration with the broader Microsoft security ecosystem, giving defenders a unified surface for detection, investigation, and response without requiring separate agent deployments for each capability.
---
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is an endpoint detection and response (EDR) platform that operates across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS devices. It is delivered as a cloud-connected service and is included in Microsoft 365 E5 licensing, though it is also available as a standalone product under Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Plan 1 and Plan 2. Plan 1 covers attack surface reduction, next-generation antivirus, and basic device control. Plan 2 adds the full EDR engine, threat and vulnerability management, advanced hunting, and automated investigation and response.
MDE is distinct from Microsoft Defender Antivirus (MDAV), which is the on-device antimalware engine built into Windows. MDAV is a component that MDE incorporates and depends on, but they are not the same product. MDE is also not a SIEM. It is a signal-rich EDR platform that feeds data into Microsoft Sentinel (Microsoft's cloud-native SIEM) rather than replacing it. Security teams that conflate MDE with a full security operations platform often discover gaps in log aggregation, alert correlation across non-Microsoft sources, and compliance reporting that require Sentinel or a third-party SIEM alongside MDE.
MDE is also not a network security tool. It does not replace next-generation firewalls, web proxies, or email security gateways. Its focus is endpoint telemetry: what processes ran, what network connections they made, what registry keys they touched, and what files they created or modified. It provides some network-layer context through endpoint-based network event logging, but it does not sit in the network path.
Variants and deployment modes include fully managed MDE through the Microsoft 365 Defender portal, co-management scenarios with Microsoft Intune, and server-side deployment for Windows Server and Linux workloads. Government cloud variants exist under Microsoft 365 GCC and GCC High environments with separate compliance boundaries.
---
MDE's architecture rests on three foundational layers: kernel-level sensor collection, cloud-based analytics and threat intelligence, and response capability both automated and analyst-driven.
Sensor Collection and Telemetry
The MDE sensor is embedded in the Windows operating system at the kernel level, which means it cannot be disabled by processes running in user space. On Windows endpoints enrolled in MDE, the sensor continuously captures behavioral signals: process creation and termination, parent-child process relationships, network connection attempts and outcomes, file system reads and writes, registry access and modification, memory allocation events, and service installations. This is not a periodic scan. It is continuous, real-time stream collection that generates a high-fidelity behavioral record of everything happening on the device.
On non-Windows platforms (macOS, Linux, Android, iOS), MDE requires installation of the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint agent. The agent functions similarly, though the depth of kernel-level telemetry varies by platform due to operating system architecture differences. Linux deployments, for example, require the mdatp package and rely on the fanotify kernel subsystem for file monitoring.
Cloud Analytics and Detection
Telemetry from enrolled devices streams to Microsoft's Defender cloud backend, where it is correlated against Microsoft's threat intelligence, which is built from signals across Microsoft's global customer base, Bing web crawling, the Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit, and dedicated threat intelligence research teams. This cloud correlation is what distinguishes MDE from a purely on-device EDR: a process that behaves abnormally on one tenant can be detected and flagged based on behavioral patterns seen across thousands of other tenants, even if that specific hash or indicator has never been observed before.
Detection rules operate across multiple layers: signature-based detection for known malware handled by MDAV, behavioral detection rules built by Microsoft's security research teams, and customer-configurable custom detection rules written in Kusto Query Language (KQL). Custom detections allow security teams to codify threat hunting findings into standing alerts that fire automatically when the same pattern appears again.
Attack Surface Reduction Rules
Attack surface reduction (ASR) rules are configurable policies that block specific technique categories before they execute. Examples include blocking Office applications from spawning child processes (a technique used in weaponized document delivery), blocking credential theft from the Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS), preventing script obfuscation execution, and blocking untrusted executables from running from removable media. ASR rules are configured per rule with modes: audit (logs but does not block), warn (user-facing warning with option to override), or block (hard prevention). Organizations typically run rules in audit mode first to identify legitimate business processes that would be affected before switching to block mode.
Automated Investigation and Response
When MDE generates an alert, its automated investigation engine begins analyzing the alert context without waiting for analyst action. The engine follows a decision tree: it examines the process that triggered the alert, looks at its parent process, checks whether the same binary has been observed on other devices in the tenant, queries file reputation from the cloud, and attempts to determine the blast radius of the activity. If the automated investigation concludes that a threat is confirmed, it can take remediation actions autonomously: quarantining files, isolating the device from the network, killing processes, and removing persistence mechanisms from the registry or startup folders.
Real-World Scenario: Detecting a Living-Off-the-Land Attack
Consider a scenario where an attacker sends a phishing email with a malicious Excel file. The user opens the file, and a macro executes cmd.exe, which spawns powershell.exe, which downloads a secondary payload using the Net.WebClient class. Without MDE, this chain might pass through MDAV undetected if the payload is fileless and loaded directly into memory. With MDE and ASR rules enabled, the Office application spawning cmd.exe is blocked by the ASR rule before the PowerShell stage begins. If ASR is in audit mode rather than block, MDE still generates an alert from the behavioral chain (Office process, to cmd, to PowerShell, to network connection), giving the analyst a full process tree in the Defender portal with the exact command-line arguments used at each stage, the network destination attempted, and the user account involved. The analyst can isolate the device with one click from the portal, preventing lateral movement while the investigation continues.
Advanced Hunting
The advanced hunting interface provides 30 days of raw telemetry queryable via KQL. Tables include DeviceProcessEvents, DeviceNetworkEvents, DeviceFileEvents, DeviceRegistryEvents, and others. A threat hunter can write a query to identify all instances where PowerShell executed with an encoded command argument across the entire tenant in the past 30 days, filter by those that also made outbound network connections, and pivot to the specific devices and users involved. Results can be converted directly into custom detection rules.
---
The practical impact of MDE on an organization's security posture is measurable in two directions: what it prevents when operating correctly, and what happens when endpoint visibility is absent or inadequate.
Business and Security Impact
MDE gives security operations center (SOC) analysts the process-level and command-line telemetry they need to investigate incidents without relying solely on user interviews or disk forensics, both of which are slow and often incomplete. The ability to isolate a compromised device remotely from the Defender portal without dispatching a technician reduces containment time from hours to minutes. Automated investigation and response handles a significant volume of low-complexity alerts autonomously, which reduces analyst workload and allows the SOC to focus on high-confidence, high-severity incidents that require human judgment.
Threat and vulnerability management (TVM) provides a continuously updated inventory of software installed across the device fleet, maps that inventory against known CVEs, and prioritizes remediation based on exploit availability and device exposure. Organizations that previously managed vulnerabilities through quarterly Nessus scans and spreadsheet-based patching processes gain a near-real-time view of exploitable exposure.
What Goes Wrong Without It
The 2020 SolarWinds supply chain compromise illustrated the consequences of insufficient endpoint visibility at scale. Defenders at many affected organizations had no way to determine which endpoints had run the malicious SUNBURST DLL, what network connections it had made, or which credentials it had accessed, because they lacked the telemetry depth that a mature EDR platform provides. Incident responders working those cases reported spending weeks reconstructing activity that an EDR with 30 days of telemetry would have surfaced in hours.
Common Misconceptions
A persistent misconception is that deploying MDE and leaving it in default configuration provides comprehensive protection. Default configurations do not enable ASR rules in block mode, do not configure automated investigation and response to full automation, and do not produce custom detections. MDE in default configuration is a detection and alert tool. MDE tuned and configured by a capable security team is a prevention and response platform. The difference in security outcome between those two states is substantial.
---
The CDA (Cyber Defense Alliance) approaches Microsoft Defender for Endpoint through the Planetary Defense Model (PDM), specifically within the Threat Intelligence and Detection (TID) domain. Within TID, MDE serves as a primary telemetry collection layer that feeds the Predictive Defense Intelligence (PDI) methodology, expressed as "See the threat before it sees you."
PDI applied to MDE means treating the platform not as a passive alert receiver but as an active intelligence collection system. Where a conventional SOC waits for MDE to generate alerts and then responds, CDA's PDI methodology runs structured threat hunts against MDE's advanced hunting telemetry on a recurring cadence, looking for behavioral patterns that match current adversary tradecraft documented in MITRE ATT&CK before those patterns have generated a formal alert. This moves defense left of the detection event, turning raw telemetry into anticipatory intelligence.
Operationally, CDA analysts working with MDE focus on three specific capabilities that most organizations underuse. First, custom detection rules are built directly from threat intelligence reporting: if a threat intelligence report describes a specific PowerShell invocation pattern used by a named threat actor, CDA converts that pattern into a KQL custom detection within 24 hours of the report being triaged. Second, ASR rule coverage is treated as a measurable metric rather than a configuration setting, with each rule mapped to specific ATT&CK techniques and its block rate tracked weekly to identify attempts the rules are stopping. Third, MDE's device risk score integration with Microsoft Intune is configured to automatically revoke network access for devices that exceed a defined risk threshold, creating an automated quarantine loop that does not require analyst intervention for the initial containment step.
Within the SPH (Security Posture and Hardening) and IAT (Incident Analysis and Triage) domains, MDE data informs baseline hardening decisions and provides the process-tree telemetry that CDA analysts use as the starting point for every Windows-based incident triage. The 30-day raw telemetry window is treated as the investigation ground truth for any endpoint incident within that window.
---
---
---