# Snort
Snort is a free, open-source network intrusion detection and prevention system (IDS/IPS) that captures, inspects, and responds to network traffic in real time. Created by Martin Roesch in 1998 and now maintained by Cisco Talos, Snort addresses one of the most persistent problems in network defense: identifying malicious traffic among the enormous volume of legitimate packets crossing an enterprise network. Before dedicated IDS/IPS tools existed, defenders had no systematic way to detect exploitation attempts, reconnaissance sweeps, or data exfiltration in transit. Snort fills that gap by applying a structured rule engine to live packet streams, generating alerts when traffic matches known attack patterns, and optionally blocking that traffic inline. Its open rule language has become the industry standard for expressing network threat signatures, making Snort both a standalone tool and a foundational component of modern network security architectures.
---
Snort is a rule-based, signature-driven network intrusion detection and prevention system operating at the packet and flow level. In detection mode (IDS), it passively inspects a copy of network traffic and generates alerts without affecting packet flow. In prevention mode (IPS), it sits inline between network segments and can actively drop, reject, or modify packets before they reach their destination.
Snort is not a firewall. A firewall enforces access control based on IP addresses, ports, and protocols defined in policy rules. Snort inspects packet payload and behavioral patterns at a deeper level, catching attacks that pass through firewall rules legitimately, such as SQL injection carried over allowed HTTP traffic or malware communicating over port 443.
Snort is also not a SIEM or log management platform. It generates alert data, but aggregating, correlating, and storing that data at scale requires integration with platforms such as Splunk, Elastic Stack, or dedicated IDS managers like Security Onion.
Snort exists in three major versions currently relevant to practitioners. Snort 2.x remains widely deployed in legacy environments and serves as the compatibility baseline for many third-party rule sets. Snort 3, released as a stable production version in 2021, represents a complete architectural rewrite featuring multi-threaded packet processing, a redesigned rule language, a pluggable component system, and native HTTP/2 inspection. The two versions share conceptual similarity but differ enough in configuration syntax and capability that they should be treated as distinct deployments.
Adjacent tools include Suricata, which is an open-source IDS/IPS with a compatible rule format and native multi-threading, and Zeek (formerly Bro), which focuses on behavioral network analysis and traffic logging rather than signature matching. Organizations sometimes deploy both Snort and Zeek together: Snort handles signature-based detection, Zeek provides protocol-level logging and anomaly context.
---
Snort processes network traffic through a defined pipeline of components. Understanding each stage is essential for deploying and tuning Snort effectively in a production environment.
Packet Acquisition
Snort captures packets from a network interface using a data acquisition (DAQ) layer. In Snort 3, the DAQ abstraction supports multiple capture backends including libpcap for passive mirrored traffic, AF_PACKET for high-performance Linux capture, and NFQ (Netfilter Queue) for inline IPS mode on Linux. The DAQ layer decouples packet capture from the detection engine, allowing the same Snort configuration to run in passive tap mode on a monitoring port or inline between a firewall and a core switch with minimal configuration changes.
Packet Decoding
Each captured packet is decoded from its raw byte representation into structured protocol fields. Snort identifies Ethernet headers, IP headers (both IPv4 and IPv6), transport layer protocols (TCP, UDP, ICMP), and application layer protocols. This decoding step makes individual packet fields available for rule matching without requiring rules to specify raw byte offsets manually.
Preprocessors and Inspectors
Before rule matching begins, Snort applies preprocessors (called inspectors in Snort 3) that handle protocol-specific normalization tasks critical for accurate detection. Stream assembly reassembles TCP streams from individual packets, preventing attackers from splitting a malicious payload across multiple packets to evade single-packet rules. IP defragmentation reconstructs fragmented IP datagrams. HTTP inspection normalizes URL encoding, handles chunked transfer encoding, and extracts HTTP fields like URI, headers, and body content as discrete match targets. Without these normalization steps, an attacker can evade a content-match rule by URL-encoding characters, splitting a GET request across packet boundaries, or fragmenting an exploit payload.
Rule Matching
Normalized packets and reassembled streams pass through Snort's rule engine. Rules follow a structured syntax: a rule header specifies the action (alert, drop, pass, log), the protocol, source and destination IP addresses and ports, and traffic direction. The rule body contains detection options enclosed in parentheses. Detection options include content matches (searching for specific byte sequences in packet payloads), PCRE for regular expression matching, byte_test for numeric comparisons in protocol fields, flow keywords for stateful matching (such as matching only on traffic flowing from server to client), and metadata fields for rule classification and reference to CVE or Bugtraq identifiers.
A practical example: detecting a specific exploit attempt against Apache Log4j (CVE-2021-44228) in HTTP request bodies. A Snort rule would specify the TCP protocol, target port 80 or 8080, direction from any external source to protected servers, and a content match for the string "${jndi:" in the HTTP body, which is the trigger pattern for the Log4Shell injection. Snort's HTTP inspector normalizes the request body before matching, so URL-encoded or otherwise obfuscated variants of that string can also be caught through normalization plus content matching. Talos published rules for Log4Shell within hours of public disclosure, demonstrating the operational speed at which the Snort rule ecosystem responds to critical vulnerabilities.
Multi-Pattern Matching
Snort runs many rules simultaneously using the Aho-Corasick multi-pattern search algorithm, which scans a packet's content for multiple strings in a single pass rather than iterating through each rule independently. This approach keeps processing overhead manageable even when thousands of rules are active.
Alert Generation and Response
When a rule matches, Snort generates an alert record containing the rule ID, message, matching packet details, timestamp, and source/destination information. In IPS mode, Snort executes the rule action: drop silently discards the packet, reject drops it and sends a TCP RST or ICMP unreachable to the sender, and pass explicitly allows traffic that might otherwise match a lower-priority rule.
Configuration Considerations
A default Snort deployment with the full Talos subscriber rule set enabled against all traffic will generate significant false positives and high alert volume. Effective deployment requires tuning: suppressing rules that do not apply to the protected environment (for example, rules for Oracle database exploits when no Oracle databases exist on the network), setting appropriate home network variables so Snort understands which IP ranges are internal, and enabling flow tracking to allow stateful rules. Rule threshold and suppression settings reduce alert noise on known-noisy signatures without disabling detection entirely.
---
Without a network IDS/IPS, defenders are largely blind to attack activity occurring inside the network perimeter. Firewall logs show which connections were permitted or denied, but they reveal nothing about what happened within those permitted sessions. An attacker exploiting a web application, moving laterally between hosts, or exfiltrating data over an allowed protocol leaves no trace in firewall logs. Snort closes that gap by providing visibility into the content and behavior of network sessions.
Operational Impact
Organizations that deploy Snort as part of a monitored security architecture gain a detection layer that identifies known attack patterns in real time. Security operations center (SOC) analysts receive alerts correlated with specific threat signatures, giving them immediate context about what attack technique is being observed, which systems are targeted, and which CVEs or malware families are involved. This context dramatically reduces the time required to triage an event compared to discovering it through endpoint logs or user reports after the fact.
In IPS mode, Snort can block known exploit traffic before it reaches a vulnerable system, providing protection even when patching is delayed. Patching cycles in enterprise environments often span weeks or months. An IPS rule for a critical vulnerability can provide interim protection during that window.
Real-World Incident Context
During the 2017 WannaCry ransomware outbreak, organizations with active network IDS/IPS deployments running rules for the EternalBlue exploit (MS17-010) were able to detect and block lateral movement attempts within their networks even before endpoint security tools triggered. Snort-compatible rules for EternalBlue were available and widely distributed. Organizations that had deployed Snort in IPS mode with current rule sets blocked the SMB exploitation traffic that WannaCry depended on for propagation, containing infections to initially compromised hosts rather than allowing network-wide spread.
Common Misconceptions
A frequent misconception is that Snort provides complete protection on its own. Snort detects and blocks known threats based on signatures. It is not designed to detect truly novel, zero-day attacks for which no rule exists. Organizations sometimes deploy Snort and assume the network is protected, without recognizing that zero-day exploitation, encrypted command-and-control traffic on approved protocols, and slow-and-low reconnaissance can all occur without triggering existing rules. Snort is a critical component of a layered defense, not a complete solution by itself.
A second misconception is that open-source means inferior. Snort's Talos-maintained rule set is one of the most comprehensive and rapidly updated threat intelligence feeds available, covering current CVEs, active malware campaigns, and emerging attack techniques with multiple daily updates for subscribers.
---
CDA approaches Snort through the Planetary Defense Model (PDM) under the Threat Intelligence and Detection (TID) domain, informed by the Predictive Defense Intelligence (PDI) methodology: "See the threat before it sees you."
From a PDI standpoint, Snort's rule-based engine is most powerful when it is fed intelligence that anticipates attacker behavior rather than reacting to it after exploitation. CDA's operational approach treats the Snort rule set as a living threat model. Rather than deploying a default rule set and accepting whatever alerts emerge, CDA-aligned teams map active threat intelligence directly to Snort rules: if current intelligence indicates a specific threat actor is targeting organizations in a client's sector using a specific exploit or malware family, CDA analysts verify that Snort rules covering that technique are active, tuned, and generating high-fidelity alerts in the client environment.
CDA also treats Snort telemetry as a primary input to the broader TID pipeline. Raw Snort alerts feed into a centralized analysis platform where they are correlated with endpoint telemetry, authentication logs, and external threat feeds. This correlation is what transforms a Snort alert from an isolated event into an actionable incident: a single alert for a port scan means little, but that same alert correlated with subsequent alerts for credential stuffing from the same source IP, followed by a successful authentication event, indicates an active intrusion sequence requiring immediate response.
On the Vulnerability and Security Design (VSD) side, Snort deployment quality serves as an indicator of network architecture maturity. CDA assessments examine where Snort sensors are positioned, whether they cover north-south traffic (perimeter), east-west traffic (internal lateral movement paths), and cloud-connected segments. Gaps in sensor placement are treated as architectural vulnerabilities, not configuration deficiencies, because they represent network paths where an attacker can operate without generating detection telemetry.
CDA also validates that Snort IPS rules are not just alerting but blocking, and that the blocking coverage aligns with the client's highest-risk attack vectors. Alerting without blocking on a critical exploit signature, when inline IPS mode is technically feasible, represents an accepted risk that must be explicitly documented and reviewed.
---
---
---